D.C. Circuit Affirms IRS Authority to Require Practitioner Tax Id Numbers & Impose a User Fee: Montrois v. United States

26 Pages Posted: 9 Apr 2020

Date Written: March 1, 2020

Abstract

In the last five years, the D.C. Circuit has considered multiple cases regarding the scope of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)’s power to regulate tax return preparers. In the most recent case, Montrois v. United States, the court held that the IRS has statutory authority to require tax return preparers to obtain a “practitioner tax identification number” (PTIN) as a prerequisite to the commercial preparation of tax returns. The holding also stated that the IRS could charge a user fee for the PTIN. In essence, Montrois justifies a licensing fee for a regulatory scheme that the very same court had previously held could not be implemented by the IRS.

This Article discusses why, in the wake of this trio of decisions, Congress should provide the IRS with clear, statutory guidance on the scope of authority it has delegated to the IRS over the tax return preparation industry. In light of these developments, Congress should articulate how broad, or narrow, the IRS’s authority over tax return preparers is, instead of the current patchwork of statutory and judicial guidance over the tax preparation industry.

Suggested Citation

Colella, Frank G., D.C. Circuit Affirms IRS Authority to Require Practitioner Tax Id Numbers & Impose a User Fee: Montrois v. United States (March 1, 2020). 20 Houston Business & Tax Law J. 56, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3570589

Frank G. Colella (Contact Author)

Pace University ( email )

One Pace Plaza
New York, NY 10038-1502
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
25
Abstract Views
574
PlumX Metrics