Advancing the Business and Human Rights Treaty Project Through International Criminal Law: Assessing the Options for Legally-Binding Corporate Human Rights Obligations

50 Pages Posted: 4 May 2020

See all articles by Jonathan Kolieb

Jonathan Kolieb

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technolog (RMIT University) - Graduate School of Business and Law

Date Written: February 28, 2020

Abstract

The current United Nations process for drafting a Business and Human Rights treaty employs international human rights law as its paradigmatic frame of reference, including for the scope of corporations’ legal obligations. Applying an evaluative framework based on Thomas Franck, Robert Keohane and David Victor’s works on the legitimacy and effectiveness of international law and governance, this Article critiques the use of international human rights law for this purpose. Instead, due to several conceptual and practical advantages, it argues that the set of corporate human rights obligations to be enshrined in this first treaty should be based on the narrower scope of international criminal law.

Keywords: business and human rights; international criminal law; legitimacy; global governance; international law; treaty-making

Suggested Citation

Kolieb, Jonathan, Advancing the Business and Human Rights Treaty Project Through International Criminal Law: Assessing the Options for Legally-Binding Corporate Human Rights Obligations (February 28, 2020). Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 50, No. 4 (2019), p789., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3571064

Jonathan Kolieb (Contact Author)

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technolog (RMIT University) - Graduate School of Business and Law ( email )

Melbourne
Australia
61399251553 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
79
Abstract Views
395
Rank
613,048
PlumX Metrics