Expenditure Response to Increases in In‐Kind Transfers: Evidence from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
15 Pages Posted: 15 Apr 2020
Date Written: March 2015
Abstract
Economic theory predicts that households who receive less in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits than they spend on food will treat SNAP benefits as if they were cash. However, empirical tests of these predictions draw different conclusions. In this study, we reexamine this question using recent increases in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, the largest of which was due to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. We find that increases in benefits cause households to increase their food budget share by more than would be predicted by theory. Results are robust to a host of specification tests.
Keywords: Labeling effect, Stimulus Bill, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Expenditure Response to Increases in In‐Kind Transfers: Evidence from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $42.00 .
File name: AJAE.pdf
Size: 0K
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.
