Cross-Listing of Korean Companies on Foreign Exchanges: Law and Policy

16 Pages Posted: 4 Dec 2002

See all articles by Hwa-Jin Kim

Hwa-Jin Kim

Woo Yun Kang Jeong & Han, Seoul

Abstract

The Korean case may be the only example that shows governmental adoption of the piggybacking paradigm focusing on cross-listing. The story of Korea is particularly interesting because it tells us the opposite of what many developing countries pursue in respect of migration of their firms to foreign markets. What caused Korea to adopt such a policy? Perhaps, it was the exogenous shocks it experienced during the financial crisis in 1997 followed by the involvement of international lending agencies in an unprecedent sweeping reform process.

This article reviews current discussions on the relations between cross-listing and corporate governance reform from a Korean perspective. Being largely descriptive, this article focuses on the Korean government's new policy towards corporate sector and capital markets reforms through cross-listing of the Korean firms on foreign exchanges. After a quick introduction to some empirical findings on market reaction to cross-listings of Korean companies, it discusses recent change in regulations that govern the cross-listing of Korean companies on foreign exchanges as well as that of foreign companies on Korean exchanges. This article concludes by putting the Korean situation in the context of on-going academic discussions on competition among stock exchanges and regulatory competition on an international scale.

Suggested Citation

Kim, Hwa-Jin, Cross-Listing of Korean Companies on Foreign Exchanges: Law and Policy. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=357760 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.357760

Hwa-Jin Kim (Contact Author)

Woo Yun Kang Jeong & Han, Seoul ( email )

Textile Center 12Fl., 944-31 Daechi-dong
Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-713
Korea
++82 2 528 5200 (Phone)
++82 2 528 5228 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
419
Abstract Views
3,741
rank
75,861
PlumX Metrics