Contracts and Inequity Aversion
26 Pages Posted: 10 Dec 2002
Date Written: November 2002
Abstract
Using the concept of Inequity Aversion we derive in a Moral Hazard setting several results which differ from conventional contract theory. Our three key insights are: First, inequity aversion plays a crucial role in the design of optimal contracts. Second, there is a strong tendency towards linear sharing rules, giving a simple and plausible rationale for the prevalence of these schemes in the real world. Third, the Sufficient Statistics result no longer holds as optimal contracts may be "too" complete. Along with these key insights we derive a couple of further results.
Keywords: Contract Theory, Linear Contracts, Incentives, Sufficient Statistics Result, Inequity Aversion, Fairness
JEL Classification: D63, J3, M12, Z13
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Moral Hazard and Other-Regarding Preferences
By Hideshi Itoh
-
Envy and Compassion in Tournaments
By Christian Grund and Dirk Sliwka
-
Optimal Incentive Contracts Under Inequity Aversion
By Florian Englmaier and Achim Wambach
-
The Intensity of Incentives in Firms and Markets: Moral Hazard With Envious Agents
-
Optimal Incentive Contracts for a Worker Who Envies His Boss
By Robert Dur and Amihai Glazer
-
Output and Wages with Inequality Averse Agents
By Dominique Demougin, Claude Fluet, ...
-
Inequity Aversion in Tournaments
By Dominique Demougin and Claude Fluet
-
Optimal Contracts When Agents Envy Each Other
By Anjan V. Thakor and Anand M. Goel