Using Dispute System Design Methods to Promote Good-Faith Participation in Court-Connected Mediation Programs
74 Pages Posted: 5 Feb 2003 Last revised: 22 Nov 2021
Date Written: 2002
This Article discusses what can be done to promote productive behavior in mediation and reduce bad conduct. Although most participants do not abuse the mediation process, some people use mediation to drag out litigation, gain leverage for later negotiations, and generally wear down the opposition. Rules requiring good-faith participation are likely to be ineffective and possibly counterproductive. This Article proposes using dispute system design principles to develop policies satisfying the interests of stakeholders in court-connected mediation programs. After outlining important interests of key stakeholder groups, including litigants, attorneys, courts, and mediators, the Article describes specific policies that could satisfy their interests. These policies include collaborative education about good mediation practice, pre-mediation consultations and submission of documents, a limited and specific attendance requirement, and protections against misrepresentation. If faithfully implemented, these policies will enhance the integrity of mediation programs and satisfy the interests of the stakeholder groups without the problems caused by good-faith requirements.
Keywords: court-connected mediation, dispute system design, system design, good faith, bad faith, confidentiality
JEL Classification: K49
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Empirical Study of the Civil Justice System
The Pros and Cons of Getting to Yes - Shortcomings and Limitations of Principled Bargaining in Negotiation and Mediation
By Katja Funken
Lurking in the Shadow: The Unseen Hand of Doctrine in Dispute Resolution
Court-Connected Mediation in General Civil Cases: What We Know from Empirical Research
Civil Procedure: General Economic Analysis
Empirical Scholarship in Contract Law: Possibilities and Pitfalls
Cooperation in Transactions and Disputes: A Problem-Solving Legal System?
Federal Rules, Local Rules, and State Rules: Uniformity, Divergence, and Emerging Procedural Patterns
Exploring the Battle of the Forms in Action