Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication. Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed. For more information on this collaboration, see the comments published in The Lancet about the trial period, and our decision to make this a permanent offering, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact email@example.com.
Public Perceptions on Data Sharing: Comparing Attitudes in the US and UK
15 Pages Posted: 2 Jun 2020More...
Summary: The past decade has seen a significant rise in ‘big data’ and artificial intelligence (AI) applications aiming to improve the quality, safety and efficiency of care. Yet, recent data breach and cybersecurity scandals have raised public awareness of data security and privacy risks. This study aimed to examine public perceptions towards data sharing, data access and the use of AI.
Methods: A YouGov survey was conducted with nationally representative samples of citizens across the United Kingdom (UK; n=2,080) and United States (US; n=1,114). The survey queried respondents’ access to and perceived usefulness of Personal Health Records (PHR), willingness to share anonymous Personal Health Information (PHI), and attitudes towards the use of AI in healthcare.
Findings: Respondents reported limited use of PHR in both countries. PHR access was particularly low in the UK (14.3%, 95% CI [12.8, 15.8]) compared to the US (44.5%, 95% CI [41.6, 47.4]). Apprehension towards sharing of PHI was higher in the US (23.4%, 95%CI [20.9, 25.9]), a largely privatised system, than in the UK (14.9%, 95%CI [13.4, 16.4]), a socialised, single-payer system, and results indicated concern amongst the public that data might not be protected from commercial end-use. Most respondents in both countries (58.2%, 95% CI [56.1, 60.3] in the UK; 51.8%, 95% CI [48.9, 54.7] in the US) were not happy to receive healthcare from AI applications, especially if without doctor or nurse support.
Interpretation: Our findings indicate growing public concern around data sharing and the use of AI in healthcare. Without sufficient investment in public trust, data security and informed consent, patients may be deprived of access to novel digital solutions that could benefit their health.
Funding Statement: This work was supported by the World Innovation Summit for Health (WISH) which is hosted by the Qatar Foundation.
Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this research.
Ethics Approval Statement: The authors stated that ethics approval was not required for this study as all data was anonymous and in the public domain.
Keywords: Data; health technologies; privacy; public perceptions
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation