The Name of God on Trial: Narratives of Law, Religion and State in Malaysia

Joshua Neoh, ‘The Name of God on Trial: Narratives of Law, Religion and State in Malaysia’ (2014) 18 Law Text Culture 198

23 Pages Posted: 11 May 2020

See all articles by Joshua Neoh

Joshua Neoh

Australian National University

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

The power to name is both an awesome and awful power – it is an exercise of sovereign power. In the Abrahamic religions, the monotheistic God is the ultimate sovereign. The power to name God, then, is one of the most magnificent powers that is conceivable to humans: it is the sovereign power to name the ultimate sovereign. It is this naming of God that has been put on trial in Malaysia. The state decrees that the name ‘Allah’ is only to be used in reference to the Islamic God. Christians, in response, have insisted that the state has no monopoly over the power to name God, and they too should be able to call their God – the Christian God – by the name of ‘Allah’. The matter ends up in court, where judges are asked to decide on the name of God. This case raises a perplexing puzzle: how on earth did the human judges in Malaysia end up with the power to name the divine judge?

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Islam, Religion, Malaysia, Allah, Art 3, Art 11, Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur, Herald

Suggested Citation

Neoh, Joshua, The Name of God on Trial: Narratives of Law, Religion and State in Malaysia (2014). Joshua Neoh, ‘The Name of God on Trial: Narratives of Law, Religion and State in Malaysia’ (2014) 18 Law Text Culture 198, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3591786

Joshua Neoh (Contact Author)

Australian National University ( email )

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200
Australia

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
2
Abstract Views
53
PlumX Metrics