Turducken™ Legal Writing: Deconstructing the Multi-State Performance Test Genre

Kaci Bishop & Alexa Z. Chew, TurduckenTM Legal Writing: Deconstructing the Multi-State Performance Test Genre, 26 Legal Writing 113 (2022).

60 Pages Posted: 4 Jun 2020 Last revised: 2 Jun 2022

See all articles by Kaci Bishop

Kaci Bishop

University of North Carolina School of Law

Alexa Chew

University of North Carolina School of Law

Date Written: March 15, 2022

Abstract

The Multistate Performance Test (MPT) has been praised as the most redeeming part of the otherwise unredeemable bar exam because it most aligns with what new attorneys do in practice. It has also been praised, along with other performance tests, as a useful teaching tool throughout the law school curriculum. This article builds on prior scholarship about the MPT by analyzing the MPT as a tool for teaching and testing legal writing and professional communication skills.

The new insight that this article brings is that the testing aspect of the MPT tends to engulf the teaching aspect; understanding both of these attributes of the MPT and how they complement one another enhances the efficacy of the MPT as a teaching tool. To get the most out of the MPT as a bar taker or a law teacher, view the MPT as a legal writing assignment stuffed inside a teaching tool that is then stuffed inside a time-pressured test. To help convey this layering, you might think of the MPT as a legal writing Turducken, which is a layered dish with “a chicken stuffed inside a duck that’s then stuffed inside a turkey.”

From the outside, the MPT is a test—a timed test. That’s the turkey part of the Turducken. But somewhere inside that test is a decent legal writing assignment. That’s the chicken part of the Turducken. And the chicken is pretty great for teaching legal writing skills! Because these two layers currently clash more than they complement each other, we suggest connecting the two with thoughtful teaching. That’s the duck—a rich, juicy layer of pedagogy that can keep the testing turkey from overwhelming and compromising the benefits of the legal writing chicken. This article deconstructs the MPT by examining each layer, with the goal of teaching bar takers to develop best legal writing practices while also preparing for a time-pressured test of “minimal competency.”

The article also offers serving suggestions! The National Conference of Bar Examiners recently announced that it plans to remake the Uniform Bar Exam into a performance test, so the last part of the article details how to improve the MPT to better assess bar takers’ professional communication skills and practice-readiness.

Keywords: legal writing, genre, MPT, bar exam, multistate performance test, legal education, bar reform

Suggested Citation

Bishop, Kaci and Chew, Alexa, Turducken™ Legal Writing: Deconstructing the Multi-State Performance Test Genre (March 15, 2022). Kaci Bishop & Alexa Z. Chew, TurduckenTM Legal Writing: Deconstructing the Multi-State Performance Test Genre, 26 Legal Writing 113 (2022)., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3596148

Kaci Bishop (Contact Author)

University of North Carolina School of Law ( email )

Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States

Alexa Chew

University of North Carolina School of Law ( email )

Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
5
Abstract Views
225
PlumX Metrics