Litigating Land Use Cases in Federal Court: A Substantive Due Process Primer

55 Pages Posted: 2 Jun 2020

See all articles by Daniel R. Mandelker

Daniel R. Mandelker

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law

Date Written: June 1, 2020

Abstract

Editor’s Synopsis: This Article argues that land use plaintiffs should have access to federal courts when they can claim that abusive governmental decisions violate their substantive due process rights. Traditionally, land use plaintiffs have faced many hurdles in getting their cases into federal court. This Article shows how courts can provide effective constitutional relief in land use cases involving governmental abuse.

This Article discusses major hurdles that land use plaintiffs traditionally face when bringing a case in federal court, including the entitlement rule, the ripeness barrier, and Graham preemption. The entitlement rule means that a plaintiff must have an entitlement to property before she can bring a substantive due process claim. The ripeness barrier requires a plaintiff in a takings case to obtain a final decision from the local government before bringing a takings claim in federal court. Graham preemption prevents a court from hearing a substantive due process case if the case could have been brought under a more specific constitutional clause, such as the takings clause.

This Article concludes with a discussion of the appropriate standard of review that should be applied in land use substantive due process cases. The Article rejects the shocks the conscious standard applied by the Supreme Court in influential Fourth Amendment cases as the appropriate standard and goes on to discuss the inconsistency of standards applied within circuits to other substantive due process cases. The Article ends with an analysis of the “arbitrary conduct” standard of judicial review applied when municipalities engaged in abusive conduct in land use cases.

Suggested Citation

Mandelker, Daniel R., Litigating Land Use Cases in Federal Court: A Substantive Due Process Primer (June 1, 2020). 55 Real Prop. Tr. & Est. L.J. 69, Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 20-05-05, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3599219

Daniel R. Mandelker (Contact Author)

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law ( email )

Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
49
Abstract Views
309
PlumX Metrics