What is Better for Fusion?

American Journal of Applied Sciences 2020, Volume 17: 83.87 (2020), DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2020.83.87

5 Pages Posted: 9 Jun 2020

See all articles by Florian Ion Petrescu

Florian Ion Petrescu

Polytechnic University of Bucharest - ARoTMM-IFToMM

Date Written: May 14, 2020

Abstract

It is commonly considered that on earth, the fusion reaction could be started more simply if deuterium or more recently tritium, i.e., hydrogen isotopes 2 and 3, are used because they have a larger (and also atomic) nuclear mass and they will be easier to break down and then merge to obtain nuclear energy through fusion. In the present work, the author makes a new hypothesis, contrary to the classical ones, by which it is shown that it could be much simpler to perform the fusion of hydrogen on the ground (like that in the sun) directly on its first protium isotope. Obviously it will work with ions, so for the proposed protium isotope, a proton will be taken into account, so the atom without electron, or in other words only the nucleus of the first hydrogen isotope and not the whole atom.

Keywords: Matter, Structure, Dimensions, Nuclear Energy, Fusion, Elementary Particle Dynamics, Condensed Matter

Suggested Citation

Petrescu, Florian Ion, What is Better for Fusion? (May 14, 2020). American Journal of Applied Sciences 2020, Volume 17: 83.87 (2020), DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2020.83.87 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3600906

Florian Ion Petrescu (Contact Author)

Polytechnic University of Bucharest - ARoTMM-IFToMM ( email )

Romania

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
44
Abstract Views
115
PlumX Metrics