Business Secrecy Expansion and FOIA

48 Pages Posted: 9 Jun 2020

See all articles by Deepa Varadarajan

Deepa Varadarajan

Georgia State University - J. Mack Robinson College of Business; Georgia State University - College of Law

Date Written: May 1, 2020

Abstract

Expansive trade secrecy claims (e.g., regarding voting machine software and government contractor pricing) can negatively impact government transparency and democratic accountability. In one important context—Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) cases—courts have addressed these concerns by imposing constraints on the definition of “trade secrets” and “confidential” commercial information that can be lawfully withheld from requesters (e.g., journalists) under Exemption 4. Last summer, however, the Supreme Court’s Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader decision toppled these constraints. Wiping away four decades of circuit court precedent, the Court held that commercial information can be withheld under Exemption 4, provided that the submitter customarily treated it as private. Prior to this decision, such information could be withheld only if its disclosure would cause the submitter “substantial competitive harm.” Food Marketing’s permissive new standard will dramatically expand the private sector’s ability to shield from public view information provided to the government.

This Article is the first to explore Food Marketing and its consequences through the lens of trade secrecy law. I demonstrate that Food Marketing’s expansion of exempt business secrets under FOIA is quite consistent with the broader pattern of trade secrecy expansion in common and statutory law. In both contexts—FOIA and civil trade secret litigation—courts have replaced strict constraints on the definition of proprietary secrets with a more open-ended analysis that focuses on a firm’s privacy practices and preferences. This newfound consistency is ironic, given that FOIA courts spent many decades rejecting the more expansive definition of trade secrecy in civil litigation and opting instead for a narrower definition that aligned with FOIA’s disclosure mandate. I suggest that Food Marketing’s new test may sweep even more broadly than its civil trade secrecy counterpart. For the latter’s focus on employee-defendants comes with inherent restrictions on firms’ overbroad claims that the FOIA context lacks. These differences and FOIA’s unique role in promoting government accountability suggest the need for additional constraints on firms’ assertions of business secrecy.

Keywords: trade secrets, FOIA, intellectual property

Suggested Citation

Varadarajan, Deepa, Business Secrecy Expansion and FOIA (May 1, 2020). UCLA Law Review, Vol. 68, 2021, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3600996

Deepa Varadarajan (Contact Author)

Georgia State University - J. Mack Robinson College of Business ( email )

P.O. Box 4050
Atlanta, GA 30303-3083
United States

Georgia State University - College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 4037
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
43
Abstract Views
190
PlumX Metrics