Anti-Slapp Coverage and the First Amendment: Hurdles to Defamation Suits in Political Campaigns
69 Am. U. L. Rev. 1541 (2020)
18 Pages Posted: 25 May 2020
Date Written: 2020
Defamation cases often arise out of intemperate or offensive statements made in political campaigns. These comments may refer to a candidate’s criminal history, familial conduct, or other matters. Whatever the subject, emotions undoubtedly run high during hotly contested campaigns. However, First Amendment protection is at its zenith when speakers engage in political speech, and speech about political candidates is inherently political speech. Thus, defamation suits arising out of political campaigns face significant hurdles, including (1) anti-SLAPP statutes and a greater public awareness of SLAPP suits; (2) a history and tradition of mudslinging and enhanced protection of political speech during political campaigns; and (3) the first-amendment-inspired doctrine of rhetorical hyperbole. This Article addresses these three obstacles.
Keywords: Defamation, political campaigns, First Amendment, SLAPP
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation