Anti-Slapp Coverage and the First Amendment: Hurdles to Defamation Suits in Political Campaigns

18 Pages Posted: 25 May 2020

Date Written: 2020

Abstract

Defamation cases often arise out of intemperate or offensive statements made in political campaigns. These comments may refer to a candidate’s criminal history, familial conduct, or other matters. Whatever the subject, emotions undoubtedly run high during hotly contested campaigns. However, First Amendment protection is at its zenith when speakers engage in political speech, and speech about political candidates is inherently political speech. Thus, defamation suits arising out of political campaigns face significant hurdles, including (1) anti-SLAPP statutes and a greater public awareness of SLAPP suits; (2) a history and tradition of mudslinging and enhanced protection of political speech during political campaigns; and (3) the first-amendment-inspired doctrine of rhetorical hyperbole. This Article addresses these three obstacles.

Keywords: Defamation, political campaigns, First Amendment, SLAPP

Suggested Citation

Hudson, David L., Anti-Slapp Coverage and the First Amendment: Hurdles to Defamation Suits in Political Campaigns (2020). American University Law Review, Vol. 69, No. 5, 2020, Belmont University College of Law Research Paper No. 2020-15, 69 Am. U. L. Rev. 1541 (2020), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3605742

David L. Hudson (Contact Author)

Belmont University - College of Law ( email )

1900 Belmont Boulevard
Nashville, TN 37212
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
48
Abstract Views
303
PlumX Metrics