Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery: A Lost Opportunity for the UK's Protection of Physical Privacy?

38 Pages Posted: 20 May 2020 Last revised: 8 Sep 2020

See all articles by Aidan Economu

Aidan Economu

Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni

Date Written: May 20, 2020

Abstract

The inadequacies of English common and statutory law have left a noticeable gap in the UK's protection of physical privacy. Mann J's decision in Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery helped fill this gap as it acknowledged that overlooking between neighbours could constitute an actionable nuisance. However, the Court of Appeal reversed this development, reaffirming that private nuisance cannot be used to combat breaches of privacy. This paper evaluates the extent to which the High Court decision in Fearn was a useful and desirable tool for defending physical privacy, so as to assess the correctness of the appellate decision. It contends that Mann J's extension was a justified development as it conformed with precedent, the scheme and principles of private nuisance, the text and horizontal effect of art 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, case law in the European Court of Human Rights and broader policy. However, the paper acknowledges that Fearn was also a problematic development with limited potential as a protection mechanism. This is due to the conflict between traditional understandings of the right to privacy and nuisance's association with property, the land-based rationale for compensation in nuisance, the standing restrictions retained from Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd, irregularities with the common law's favourable attitude towards children's privacy, and Fearn's similarities to anti-harassment legislation. Overall, the paper concludes that although Fearn was not perfect in its treatment of physical privacy, it was a step in the right direction and contributed at least partially to filling the persistent lacuna in English privacy law.

Keywords: 'fearn v board of trustees of the tate gallery', privacy law, nuisance

JEL Classification: K00, K13

Suggested Citation

Economu, Aidan, Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery: A Lost Opportunity for the UK's Protection of Physical Privacy? (May 20, 2020). Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 23/2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3606049 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3606049

Aidan Economu (Contact Author)

Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, Victoria 6140
New Zealand

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
434
PlumX Metrics