Liquidity Restrictions, Runs, and Central Bank Interventions: Evidence from Money Market Funds

Liquidity restrictions on investors, like the redemption gates and liquidity fees introduced in the 2016 money market fund (MMF) reform, are meant to improve financial stability. However, we find evidence that such liquidity restrictions exacerbated the run on prime MMFs during the COVID-19 crisis. Our results indicate that gates and fees could generate strategic complementarities among investors in crisis times. Severe outflows from prime MMFs led the Federal Reserve to intervene with the Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (MMLF). Using MMLF micro-data, we show how the provision of "liquidity of last resort" stabilized prime funds.

Keywords: runs, money market funds, redemption gates and liquidity fees, strategic complementarities, COVID-19, MMLF

JEL Classification: G23, G28, E58

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Li, Lei and Li, Yi and Macchiavelli, Marco and Zhou, Xing (Alex), Liquidity Restrictions, Runs, and Central Bank Interventions: Evidence from Money Market Funds (May 24, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3607593 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3607593