Reciprocity in China-U.S. Judgments Recognition

53 Pages Posted: 18 Jun 2020

See all articles by William S. Dodge

William S. Dodge

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Wenliang Zhang

Renmin University of China

Date Written: May 24, 2020

Abstract

The conventional wisdom is that China and the United States do not recognize each other’s court judgments. But this is changing. A U.S. court first recognized a Chinese judgment in 2009, and a Chinese court first reciprocated in 2017. This Article provides an overview of the enforcement of U.S. judgments in China and Chinese judgments in the United States, noting the similarities and differences in the two countries’ systems. In China, rules for the enforcement of foreign judgments are established at the national level and require reciprocity. In the United States, rules for the enforcement of foreign judgments are established at the state level and generally do not require reciprocity.

This Article also looks at possibilities for future cooperation in the enforcement of foreign judgments, through a bilateral treaty, a multilateral convention, and the application of domestic law. It concludes that progress in the recognition and enforcement of China-U.S. judgments is most likely to come from continued judicial practice under existing rules and from China’s shifting approach to reciprocity.

Keywords: reciprocity, foreign judgments, judgments, private international law

Suggested Citation

Dodge, William S. and Zhang, Wenliang, Reciprocity in China-U.S. Judgments Recognition (May 24, 2020). Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3609349

William S. Dodge (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201
United States

Wenliang Zhang

Renmin University of China ( email )

Beijing, Beijing 100872
China

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
16
Abstract Views
51
PlumX Metrics