Does the Bar Exam Protect the Public?

69 Pages Posted: 22 Jun 2020

See all articles by Kyle Rozema

Kyle Rozema

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law

Date Written: May 28, 2020

Abstract

I study the effects of requiring lawyers to pass the bar exam on whether they are later publicly disciplined for misconduct. In the 1980s, four states began to require graduates from all law schools to pass the bar exam by abolishing what is known as a diploma privilege. My research design exploits these events to estimate the effect of the diploma privilege on the share of lawyers who receive public sanctions by state discipline bodies. Lawyers admitted on diploma privilege receive public sanctions at similar rates to lawyers admitted after passing a bar exam for the first decade of their careers, but small differences begin to emerge after a decade, and larger differences emerge after two decades. The estimates suggest that the diploma privilege increased the share of lawyers who received a public sanction within 25 years after bar admission from 4.5 percent to between 4.6 and 6.5 percent.

Suggested Citation

Rozema, Kyle, Does the Bar Exam Protect the Public? (May 28, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3612481 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3612481

Kyle Rozema (Contact Author)

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law ( email )

Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
111
Abstract Views
638
rank
270,626
PlumX Metrics