A Note on the Cointegration of Consumption, Income, and Wealth
19 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2003
Date Written: November 5, 2002
Abstract
Lettau and Ludvigson (2001) argue that a log-linearized approximation to an aggregate budget constraint predicts that log consumption, assets, and labor income will be cointegrated. They conclude that this cointegrating relationship is present in U.S. data, and that the estimated cointegrating residual forecasts future asset growth. This note examines whether the cointegrating relationship suggested by Lettau and Ludvigson's theoretical framework actually exists. We demonstrate that we cannot reject the hypothesis that cointegration is absent from the data once we employ measures of consumption, assets, and labor income that are jointly consistent with an underlying budget constraint. By contrast, Lettau and Ludvigson use a set of variables that do not belong together in an aggregate budget constraint, thereby testing a cointegrating relationship that is not implied by their theory.
Keywords: Consumption, asset returns, cointegration, budget constraints
JEL Classification: E21, E44
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Consumption, Income, and Interest Rates: Reinterpreting the Time Series Evidence
-
Risk Aversion and Intertemporal Substitution in the Capital Asset Pricing Model
By Philippe Weil and Alberto Giovannini
-
Measuring Risk Aversion from Excess Returns on a Stock Index
By Ray Chou, Robert F. Engle, ...
-
Time-Series Tests of a Non-Expected-Utility Model of Asset Pricing
-
Why Did Japan's Household Savings Rate Fall in the 1990s?
By Kazuo Ogawa
-
Nonexponential Discounting: A Direct Test and Perhaps a New Puzzle
By Richard Startz and Kwok Ping Tsang