Befriending the Court: Behind and Beyond the 2016 Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Rulings in Uganda

23 Pages Posted: 26 Jun 2020

See all articles by J. Oloka-Onyango

J. Oloka-Onyango

Makerere University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: June 2, 2020

Abstract

In the heat of the 2016 presidential election petition challenging the re-election of Yoweri Kaguta Museveni in Uganda, two amicus curiae applications were filed in the Supreme Court--one from a group of civil society activists, while the other was instituted by nine Makerere University law professors. This article provides a review and analysis of the Supreme Court decisions on the two applications against the backdrop of a largely conservative approach to the admission of amicus curiae briefs in Ugandan courts. It argues that the decision in the Makerere professors’ case set a progressive precedent for the admission of such applications, and clarified several issues, including the questions of bias, the expertise of the intended ‘friends’, and the place of the public in such an application.

Suggested Citation

Oloka-Onyango, Joe, Befriending the Court: Behind and Beyond the 2016 Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Rulings in Uganda (June 2, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3617254 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3617254

Joe Oloka-Onyango (Contact Author)

Makerere University - Faculty of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 7062
Kampala
Uganda

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
32
Abstract Views
106
PlumX Metrics