Texas MDL

27 Pages Posted: 10 Sep 2020

Date Written: June 5, 2020

Abstract

Federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) gets all the attention. This mechanism for consolidating cases filed around the country in a single federal district court for pretrial proceedings has become the dominant mode of resolving mass torts in U.S. courts. But not all mass adjudications find their way into federal court. Texas, like about half of the states, has developed an MDL mechanism to coordinate proceedings within its own courts. In this Symposium Essay, we examine the history, doctrine, and data of Texas MDL. Although Texas modeled its approach on the federal MDL statute, the Texas MDL system differs in important ways from federal MDL. And when those differences are combined with Texas’s system for electing judges, we find that Texas’s MDL design choices have important consequences for parties, courts, and voters.

Keywords: multidistrict litigation, complex litigation, mass torts, civil procedure, state courts, federalism, judicial elections

JEL Classification: k41

Suggested Citation

Rave, D. Theodore and Clopton, Zachary D., Texas MDL (June 5, 2020). 24 Lewis & Clark Law Review 367 (2020), U of Houston Law Center No. 2020-A-39, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3620148

D. Theodore Rave (Contact Author)

University of Houston Law Center ( email )

4604 Calhoun Road
Houston, TX 77204-6060
United States
713-743-2499 (Phone)

Zachary D. Clopton

Northwestern University - Northwestern Pritzker School of Law ( email )

750 N. Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
13
Abstract Views
96
PlumX Metrics