Maximizing #MeToo: Intersectionality & the Movement

Boston College Law Review, Vol. 62, Issue 6, Pp. 1797.
(2021). Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. 2281.

69 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2020 Last revised: 29 Sep 2021

Date Written: June 1, 2021

Abstract

Although women of color experience high rates of harassment and assault, the #MeToo movement has largely left them on the margins in terms of (1) the online conversation, (2) the traditional social movement activity occurring offline, and (3) the consequential legal activity. This Article analyzes how race shapes experiences of harassment and how seemingly positive legal strides continue to fail women of color thirty years beyond Kimberlé Crenshaw’s initial framing of intersectionality theory. I discuss the weaknesses of the reform efforts and argue for more tailored strategies that take into account the ineffectiveness of our current Title VII framework and, more specifically, the continuing failure of the law to properly deal with intersectionality. This analysis and the resulting proposal demonstrate how advocates can leverage #MeToo as an opportunity to reshape law, organizations, and culture in a way that better protects all women, and particularly women of color.

Keywords: legal reforms, antidiscrimination laws, activism, race, gender, harassment, MeToo, intersectionality

Suggested Citation

Bowman Williams, Jamillah, Maximizing #MeToo: Intersectionality & the Movement (June 1, 2021). Boston College Law Review, Vol. 62, Issue 6, Pp. 1797.
(2021). Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. 2281., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3620439 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3620439

Jamillah Bowman Williams (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,176
Abstract Views
1,403
rank
25,152
PlumX Metrics