How Policing Incentives Affect Crime, Measurement, and Justice

53 Pages Posted: 27 Sep 2020 Last revised: 22 Sep 2022

See all articles by Jordan Adamson

Jordan Adamson

Leipzig University, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics

Lucas Rentschler

Utah State University - Department of Economics and Finance

Date Written: August 10, 2020

Abstract

We develop a model where the police face a trade-off between investigating and patrolling, while civilians choose between producing and stealing. The equilibrium numbers of criminals and producers, punished or not, are summarized in a truth table of criminal justice. High-powered police incentives affect all elements of the table, and can have non-monotone effects on crime while increasing both the clearance rate and false positives. We report an experiment that varies how severely an officer is punished for false punishments and find that stronger reprimands do not change crime but do cause civilian incomes to increase and false positives to decrease. The clearance rate, however, is also decreasing with stronger reprimands, which suggests the police performance is better when in fact it is worse.

Keywords: police incentives, crime, truth table of criminal justice

JEL Classification: C7, J1, K4

Suggested Citation

Adamson, Jordan and Rentschler, Lucas, How Policing Incentives Affect Crime, Measurement, and Justice (August 10, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3628595 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3628595

Jordan Adamson (Contact Author)

Leipzig University, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics ( email )

Grimmaische Str. 12
Leipzig, 04109
Germany

Lucas Rentschler

Utah State University - Department of Economics and Finance ( email )

Logan, UT 84322-1400
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
168
Abstract Views
1,048
Rank
293,757
PlumX Metrics