Profiting From Our Pain: Privileged Access to Social Impact Investing

48 Pages Posted: 14 Jul 2020

See all articles by Cary Martin Shelby

Cary Martin Shelby

Washington and Lee University School of Law

Date Written: June 2020

Abstract

Social impacting investing has become the latest trend to permeate the financial markets. With massive anticipated funding gaps for sustainable development goals, and a millennial driven thirst for doing good while doing well, this trend is likely to continue in the coming decades. This burgeoning industry is poised to experience yet an additional boost, since it provides an alternative mechanism for private actors to “profit from our pain” particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Black Lives Matters movement. As to be expected, the law has not sufficiently adapted to this new wave of innovation as regulatory concerns have arisen such as the extent to which impact should be measured and disclosed. Even with this emerging focus, limited attention has been paid to whether the public/private divide under the federal securities laws has contributed to these harms. This Article seeks to fill this scholarly gap by exploring the extent to which the public/private divide under the federal securities laws induces reductions to the net social benefits generated by social impact investments. While social impact investing has the highest potential for impact along the continuum of socially conscious strategies, they largely operate as exempt entities due to the need for regulatory flexibilities such as the power to invest in illiquid assets. As a result, retail investors, which encompass all members of the general public, are restricted from accessing these privately held vehicles due to investor protection concerns. This serves to exclude affected community members as investors, who are the targeted beneficiaries of these schemes, while limiting transparency which would enable the general public as well as policy makers to make assessments about the extent to which these schemes are maximizing net social welfare. This is particularly problematic given the potential for such investments to generate unaccounted for negative externalities which can occur for example when seemingly clean energy technologies inadvertently destroy surrounding environments or habitats. Solely relying on privately ordered solutions can leave costly loopholes given that they are completely voluntary and lack standardization. Innovative regulatory solutions that reconceptualize antiquated notions of publicness may best address these harms. This Article therefore concludes with a novel proposal which seeks to combine existing indicators of “publicness” and “privateness” while perhaps creating new measures. This could be effectuated through the creation of an entirely new series of exemptions entitled the “Social Impact Exemptions” that would appear under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940. They would effectively recalibrate existing rules related to access and disclosure, while possibly creating new frameworks for accountability and management structure.

Suggested Citation

Shelby, Cary Martin, Profiting From Our Pain: Privileged Access to Social Impact Investing (June 2020). California Law Review, Vol. 109, 2021 (Forthcoming), Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2020-07, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3631099 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3631099

Cary Martin Shelby (Contact Author)

Washington and Lee University School of Law ( email )

Lexington, VA 24450
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
160
Abstract Views
1,437
rank
208,213
PlumX Metrics