The Real Consequences of Symbolic Politics: Breaking the Soviet Past in Ukraine
Journal of Politics, forthcoming
53 Pages Posted: 15 Jul 2020 Last revised: 1 Dec 2021
Date Written: November 22, 2021
Abstract
Conflicts over symbolic issues are prominent in public affairs, but do they have wider political consequences, and if so, why? We study the electoral effects of Leninopad (``Lenin's free fall''), a sudden wave of demolitions of Soviet monuments in Ukraine. Difference-in-differences estimates show that the removals of the Soviet symbols mobilized supporters for parties with a relatively sympathetic view of Ukraine's Soviet past. We attribute this backlash effect to a signaling mechanism: the removals indicated the weakening power status of the Soviet legacy parties, which motivated their supporters to turn out in elections. This backlash dissipated once the Soviet symbols ceased being a contentious partisan issue due to the escalating secessionist war. Symbolic politics has real, non-symbolic consequences, but only when it maps onto partisan cleavages.
Keywords: symbolic politics, post-communism, Ukraine, memory
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation