Pandemics and the Constitution

38 Pages Posted: 26 Jun 2020 Last revised: 9 Feb 2021

See all articles by Toni M. Massaro

Toni M. Massaro

University of Arizona College of Law

Justin R. Pidot

University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law

Marvin Slepian

University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law

Date Written: February 8, 2021

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic unleashed a torrent of legal and political commentary, and rightly so: the virus touches every corner of life and implicates all areas of law. In response to the virus, governments, civic institutions, and businesses struggled to protect public health, respect individual autonomy, and enable Americans to satisfy their elemental instinct to congregate with one another.

Our pandemic response has largely failed. Our dysfunction has led to deaths and lost livelihoods, in part because public perceptions about the virus, and interventions designed to address to it, have substantially fallen along predictable ideological lines. We must, therefore, take stock so that we can do better when the next pandemic arrives, as it surely will. We argue that ingredients for broader consensus already exist, even if they are obscured by political and policy rancor. Americans share the common goal to safely return to families, jobs, schools, places of assembly, pubs, parks, and the myriad of other settings that make up human lives and we share a fidelity to basic constitutional legal norms that can inform how we most safely return.

This Article identifies four constitutional principles to shape pandemic policies and enable them to garner broad public acceptance: substantive and procedural rationality, respect for fundamental liberties, equal treatment of similarly situated persons and entities, and sufficient government flexibility to enable officials to nimbly and effectively address emergencies that threaten life itself. Fidelity to these norms is essential for all institutions, public and private, because reopening safely can occur only through the cooperation of private individuals, who will cooperate only if they have adequate confidence in the ability of institutions to protect safety, liberty, and equality.

Keywords: COVID-19, constitutional law, health law, due process, equal protection, liberalism, fundamental rights, liberty, pandemic, discrimination

Suggested Citation

Massaro, Toni Marie and Pidot, Justin R. and Slepian, Marvin, Pandemics and the Constitution (February 8, 2021). Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 21-01, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3635668 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3635668

Toni Marie Massaro (Contact Author)

University of Arizona College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
520-626-2687 (Phone)
520-621-9140 (Fax)

Justin R. Pidot

University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States

Marvin Slepian

University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
541
Abstract Views
2,563
rank
64,743
PlumX Metrics