Behavioral Voters in Synchronized Elections: Evidence from India

Abstract

Voters in decentralized democracies vote in multiple elections across tiers, often on the same day. Rationality demands that voters follow separate decision-making processes across elections. Behavioral voters, however, may simplify decision-making using heuristics when faced with synchronized elections. We show that synchronized elections in India increase political parties’ salience among voters and increase straight-ticket voting with minimal effects on turnout, increasing the likelihood of the same political party winning across tiers. Our evidence points to voters’ cognitive constraints as a likely mechanism and finds less support for choice fatigue, coattail or other conventional mechanisms. A sequential election design can therefore facilitate more informed decision-making and shape gains from decentralization.

Keywords: Synchronized elections, Party Salience, India, Election Design

JEL Classification: D02, D72, D91, H77.