Neural Network Pricing of American Put Options

Risks 8, 73, 2020

24 Pages Posted: 4 Aug 2020

See all articles by Raquel M. Gaspar

Raquel M. Gaspar

ISEG and Cemapre/REM, Universidade de Lisboa

Sara Lopes

ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa

Bernardo Sequeira

ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa

Date Written: 2020

Abstract

In this study, we use Neural Networks (NNs) to price American put options. We propose two NN models—a simple one and a more complex one—and we discuss the performance of two NN models with the Least-Squares Monte Carlo (LSM) method. This study relies on American put option market prices, for four large U.S. companies—Procter and Gamble Company (PG), Coca-Cola Company (KO), General Motors (GM), and Bank of America Corp (BAC). Our dataset is composed of all options traded within the period December 2018 until March 2019. Although on average, both NN models perform better than LSM, the simpler model (NN Model 1) performs quite close to LSM.

Moreover, the second NN model substantially outperforms the other models, having an RMSE ca. 40% lower than the presented by LSM. The lower RMSE is consistent across all companies, strike levels, and maturities. In summary, all methods present a good accuracy; however, after calibration, NNs produce better results in terms of both execution time and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE).

Keywords: machine learning, neural networks, American put options, least-squares Monte Carlo

JEL Classification: C45, C63, G13, G17

Suggested Citation

Gaspar, Raquel M. and Lopes, Sara and Sequeira, Bernardo, Neural Network Pricing of American Put Options (2020). Risks 8, 73, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3645011

Raquel M. Gaspar (Contact Author)

ISEG and Cemapre/REM, Universidade de Lisboa ( email )

Rua Miguel Lupi, 20
room 510
Lisbon, 1249-078
Portugal

Sara Lopes

ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa ( email )

Lisboa
Portugal

Bernardo Sequeira

ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa ( email )

Lisboa
Portugal

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
52
Abstract Views
367
Rank
626,541
PlumX Metrics