Reflections on Feminism, Law & Culture: Law Students' Perspectives

This essay is a collective reflection by thirty-nine law students on feminism, law and culture. In the Spring 2020 semester, the students enrolled in the Feminist Legal Theory course taught by Professor Bridget Crawford at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University were a mixed group of men and women, second-year, third-year and fourth-year students. The course focused on the themes and methods of feminist analysis and the application of feminist legal theories to topics such as intimate partner violence, prostitution, pornography, sexual harassment, reproductive rights, and economic rights. Students attended a traditional seminar meeting once each week. Conversations continued throughout the week in a student-led asynchronous written on-line discussion forum, with a different group of student facilitators choosing the topic and guiding the conversation each week. This essay is an edited collection of student posts to the course’s online forum. It is intended to memorialize the interests, concerns, and contributions of this particular group of law students to feminist discourse during the Spring 2020 semester — a time when legal education and most aspects of American life were disrupted in an unprecedented way by the novel corona virus.

The essay organizes around ten discrete topics that reflect, but are not identical to, course material. Participants use TED talks and other videos, podcasts and news stories as entry points for engaging with topics of mutual interest. These include the nature of gender differences, the impact of gender differences on the workplace and family life, menstruation, motherhood, and feminist coalition-building. The essay both reflects students’ understanding of feminist legal theory as a distinct mode of academic inquiry and challenges feminist scholars to consider what “counts” as feminist topics from the perspective of current law students. It is a contemporaneous record of the substantive issues that these law students found important in the present moment.

Keywords: feminism, feminist legal theory, gender, legal profession, menstruation, moral reasoning, violance, transgender, surrogacy

JEL Classification: K1

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Crawford, Bridget J. and Adlam, Jessica and Bonetti, Cecilia and Bozhinova, Velislava and Brenner, Olivia and Carbia, Megan and Cilindrello, Leandra and D'Ambrosio, Rachel and Davies, Erin and DeCola, Alexandria and DiFilippo, Giovanna and Epstein, Alexis and Fineman, Jennifer and Gamarra, Vilma and Henderson, Katherine and Jonczyk, Jacqueline and Khan, Jon and Krippel, Kerri and Maligranda, Bernadette and Neal, Vanessa and O'Brien, Mackenzie and Panzarino, Erika and Patel, Bhumi and Piekarz, Victoria and Podlubny, Elisabeth and Prescod, Xavier and Presser, Daniella and Regalbuto, Karli and Rosenberg, Robert and Rosenblum, Rachel and Sedlacko, Julianna and Simpson, Samara and Spinner, Alexandra and Tommy, Ophilia and Vcherashansky, Sylvia and Wares, Drew and Weissman, Alec and Yadav, Sagar and Yaskhi, Komali, Reflections on Feminism, Law & Culture: Law Students' Perspectives (July 7, 2020). 41 Pace Law Review 105 (2020), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3645565