The Economics of Babysitting a Robot

58 Pages Posted: 27 Aug 2020

See all articles by Aleksandr Alekseev

Aleksandr Alekseev

University of Regensburg - Department of Economics and Econometrics

Date Written: July 20, 2020


I study the welfare effect of automation on workers in a setting where technology is complementary but imperfect. Using a modified task-based framework, I argue that imperfect complementary automation can impose non-pecuniary costs on workers via a behavioral channel. The theoretical model suggests that a critical factor determining the welfare effect of imperfect complementary automation is the automatability of the production process. I confirm the model’s predictions in an experiment that elicits subjects’ revealed preference for automation. Increasing automatability leads to a significant increase in the demand for automation. I explore additional drivers of the demand for automation using machine learning analysis and textual analysis of choice reasons. The analysis reveals that task enjoyment, performance, and cognitive flexibility are the most important predictors of subjects’ choices. There is significant heterogeneity in how subjects evaluate imperfect complementary automation. I discuss the implications of my results for workers’ welfare, technology adoption, and inequality.

Keywords: automation, worker welfare, imperfect technology, task-switching, personnel economics, experiment

JEL Classification: C91, D63, D91, M52, J24, O33

Suggested Citation

Alekseev, Aleksandr, The Economics of Babysitting a Robot (July 20, 2020). Available at SSRN: or

Aleksandr Alekseev (Contact Author)

University of Regensburg - Department of Economics and Econometrics ( email )

Universitaetsstrasse 31
D-93040 Regensburg

HOME PAGE: http://

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics