Redressing Historical Responsibility for the Unjust Precarities of Climate Change in the Present

Benoît Mayer & Alexander Zahar (eds), Debating Climate Law, Forthcoming

20 Pages Posted: 6 Nov 2020

See all articles by Sarah Riley Case

Sarah Riley Case

McGill University Faculty of Law; Harvard University - Institute for Global Law and Policy; University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

Julia Dehm

La Trobe Law School

Date Written: July 22, 2020

Abstract

This chapter is part of a volume on debating the law of climate change and thus assumes the style of legal debate. We argue that industrialized countries of the Global North are responsible for historical emissions that contribute to the unjust precarities of climate change in the present for states in the Global South, people living in poverty, and Black, Indigenous and other marginalized peoples in settler colonial states. First, relying on international legal doctrine, we show how the 'no harm' rule of customary international law provides one avenue of recourse. Nevertheless, we also argue that this avenue is limited because international law reflects social reality and states, companies and institutions of the Global North have power to shape the law to the detriment of others. We therefore undertake an immanent critique of international legal doctrines drawing on critical traditions, including critical race theories and Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL). We expose the internal contradictions in the law that preclude full repair for historical injustices. We also expose that international law's inability to redress the problem at hand stems from climate change's imbrication with broader histories of dispossession, including colonialism, slavery and their reincarnations in the global political economy. We therefore argue for alternatives to obtain redress. We call for "reparations" that would look to marginalized peoples for means and ends to fully decolonize the international legal order and to re-envision social relations among peoples that could also address climate harms.

Keywords: Climate Justice; Reparations; International Law; Immanent Critique; Critical Race Theory; Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL)

Suggested Citation

Riley Case, Sarah and Dehm, Julia, Redressing Historical Responsibility for the Unjust Precarities of Climate Change in the Present (July 22, 2020). Benoît Mayer & Alexander Zahar (eds), Debating Climate Law, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3658437 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3658437

Sarah Riley Case (Contact Author)

McGill University Faculty of Law ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal, Quebec H3A 1W9
Canada

Harvard University - Institute for Global Law and Policy ( email )

1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )

78 and 84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada

HOME PAGE: http://bit.ly/2wfif9S

Julia Dehm

La Trobe Law School ( email )

Department of Economics and Finance
Victoria 3552, 3086
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/law/staff/profile?uname=JDehm

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
103
Abstract Views
464
rank
315,413
PlumX Metrics