How Hemenway and Solnick Distorted the Effectiveness of Defensive Gun Use

15 Pages Posted: 29 Aug 2020 Last revised: 31 Aug 2020

See all articles by Gary Kleck

Gary Kleck

Florida State University - College of Criminology and Criminal Justice

Date Written: June 28, 2020

Abstract

Hemenway and Solnick (2015) assessed the effectiveness of crime victims using defensive gun use (DGU) to reduce their risk of injury. They obtained a positive (injury-elevating), though nonsignificant, estimate of this effect. This result is misleading because they distorted their estimates of the effect as a result of three research flaws:

(1) They needlessly reduced their sample size, relative to available data, by 75%, thereby artificially reducing the chances of obtaining statistically significant estimates of the association between victim SP actions and injury.

(2) They misclassified incidents in which injury was not inflicted after the victim’s self-protection action as incidents in which injury was inflicted after the victim’s SP action, artificially supporting the claim that the SP action provoked the offender to attack.

(3) Most importantly, they systematically omitted from their injury models virtually all of the known confounders of the DGU/injury relationship - all but one of which tended to bias that relationship upward. Thus, the failure to control these confounders artificially made it seem that DGU had more of a positive association with injury than it actually has.

Suggested Citation

Kleck, Gary, How Hemenway and Solnick Distorted the Effectiveness of Defensive Gun Use (June 28, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3659333 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3659333

Gary Kleck (Contact Author)

Florida State University - College of Criminology and Criminal Justice ( email )

Eppes Hall
112 S. Copeland Street
Tallahasse, FL 32306-1206
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
41
Abstract Views
267
PlumX Metrics