Ethics, Rule of Law and Pandemic Responses

10 Pages Posted: 30 Jul 2020

See all articles by Mark Findlay

Mark Findlay

Singapore Management University - School of Law; Singapore Management University - Centre for AI & Data Governance

Date Written: July 27, 2020

Abstract

The argument recounts a growing dissatisfaction with ethics and principled design as either the single or primary self-regulatory regime ensuring responsible data use and trustworthy AI. From this foundation it proposes rule of law compliance as a parallel and supportive normative and operational direction to address the deficiencies likely in any over-reliance on ethics regulation. In expressions of resistance to COVID responses there is scant community confidence in assertions that ethical reflections answer the deeply felt and differentially identified reservations regarding surveillance and data usage in pandemic responses. It is concluded that without the essence of democratic participation, in the form of citizen connection with emergency policymaking, and potential actionability through legal remedies if rights and liberties are compromised (both features of ‘thick rule of law’), then the regulatory legitimacy crisis facing principled regulatory regimes remains.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic, rule of law, ethics, regulation, compliance, discrimination, actionability and inclusion

Suggested Citation

Findlay, Mark James, Ethics, Rule of Law and Pandemic Responses (July 27, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3661180 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3661180

Mark James Findlay (Contact Author)

Singapore Management University - School of Law ( email )

55 Armenian Street
Singapore, 179943
Singapore

Singapore Management University - Centre for AI & Data Governance ( email )

55 Armenian Street
Singapore
Singapore

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
67
Abstract Views
318
rank
374,038
PlumX Metrics