Pregnancy or Motherhood Cost? A Comparison of the Child Penalty of Adopting and Biological Parents

22 Pages Posted: 15 Sep 2020

See all articles by Philip Rosenbaum

Philip Rosenbaum

Copenhagen Business School - Department of Economics; University of Copenhagen - Department of Economics

Date Written: May 15, 2020

Abstract

Using Danish administrative data from 1987-2018, I compare the labor earnings trajectories between adopting and biological parents. Adopting mothers by definition do not experience sex-specific comparative advantage in childcare due to pregnancy and nursing. Comparing adopting and biological parents will therefore elicit how much pregnancy to non-pregnancy related factors determine the observed gender inequality in the child penalty. I find large and significant child penalty for all mothers, although slightly smaller for the adopting mothers than for the biological mothers. Neither adopting nor biological fathers experience any child penalties. The results prove that the child penalty is a female burden no matter whether the women carry the biological costs related to pregnancies.

Keywords: Gender earnings gap, gender inequality, child penalty, adoptions

JEL Classification: J12, J16, J22, J71

Suggested Citation

Rosenbaum, Philip and Rosenbaum, Philip, Pregnancy or Motherhood Cost? A Comparison of the Child Penalty of Adopting and Biological Parents (May 15, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3666076 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3666076

Philip Rosenbaum (Contact Author)

University of Copenhagen - Department of Economics ( email )

Øster Farimagsgade 5, Bygn 26
Copenhagen, 1353
Denmark

HOME PAGE: http://https://sites.google.com/site/philrosenbaum/

Copenhagen Business School - Department of Economics ( email )

Porcelænshaven 16A 1. Sal
Frederiksberg C, DK - 2000
Denmark

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
310
Rank
719,176
PlumX Metrics