Investor-Protection Advice for the New Administration

77 Pages Posted: 18 Sep 2020 Last revised: 14 Jan 2021

Date Written: August 5, 2020


The transition from the Trump Administration to the Biden one is in full swing. Much change will follow. In the securities area, that change is expected to involve regulatory expansion in the name of investor protection. In this Article, I explain why that expansion should not involve use of the three core areas of securities law (disclosure, fraud, and insider trading). In particular, show that the core securities laws now provide, at best, extremely limited benefits on the margin for passive, long-term investors in the stock market. Importantly, this conclusion holds true even if one disagrees with the dominant law and economics thinking in the area (i.e., that there is little to no relevant investor-protection problem in the first place). I therefore attempt to shift the expected investor-protection focus to less prominent areas of securities regulation where more investor-protection value may be obtained.

Keywords: Securities Regulation, Securities Law, Mandatory Disclosure, Securities Fraud, Insider Trading

Suggested Citation

Haeberle, Kevin S., Investor-Protection Advice for the New Administration (August 5, 2020). Available at SSRN: or

Kevin S. Haeberle (Contact Author)

William & Mary Law School ( email )

613 South Henry St
Williamsburg, VA 23185
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics