Barriers to Charitable Giving

27 Pages Posted: 2 Oct 2020 Last revised: 30 Aug 2021

See all articles by Marco Castillo

Marco Castillo

Department of Economics, Texas A&M University; IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Ragan Petrie

Texas A&M University - Department of Economics; University of Melbourne - Melbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research

Clarence Wardell

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: August 1, 2021

Abstract

Donating to charity requires time, effort and attention. If the costs to give are perceived to be large, charities may lose out on donations. We develop a nonparametric test for the presence of these general nuisance costs and conduct a large-scale field experiment to show that costs to give are sizable and impactful. Potential donors were offered a 5:1 fixed match if their donation met or exceeded a minimum amount (e.g. $1, $5 or $10). Absent nuisance costs, the probability of donating should decrease as the minimum amount increases. We find the opposite. Eliminating these costs would double donations in our sample.

Keywords: charitable giving, nuisance costs, field experiment

JEL Classification: D64, H41, C93, D91

Suggested Citation

Castillo, Marco and Petrie, Ragan and Wardell, Clarence, Barriers to Charitable Giving (August 1, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3675807 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3675807

Marco Castillo

Department of Economics, Texas A&M University ( email )

Allen Building
4228 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-3137
United States

IZA Institute of Labor Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

Ragan Petrie (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University - Department of Economics ( email )

4228 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-4228
United States

University of Melbourne - Melbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research ( email )

Level 5, FBE Building, 111 Barry Street
Parkville, Victoria 3010
Australia

Clarence Wardell

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
176
Abstract Views
784
Rank
291,118
PlumX Metrics