The Rise and Fall of Clean Air Act Climate Policy

Michigan Journal of Environmental and Administrative Law, Forthcoming

112 Pages Posted: 7 Oct 2020

See all articles by Nathan D. Richardson

Nathan D. Richardson

University of South Carolina - Law Library; Resources for the Future

Date Written: July 6, 2020

Abstract

The Clean Air Act has proven to be one of the most successful and durable statutes in American law. After the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, there was great hope that the Act could be brought to bear on climate change, the most pressing current environmental challenge of our time. Massachusetts was fêted as the most important environmental case ever decided, and, upon it, the Environmental Protection Agency under President Obama built a sweeping program of greenhouse gas regulations, aimed first at emissions from road vehicles, and later at fossil fuel power plants. It was the most ambitious federal climate policy in American history. Now, twelve years after Massachusetts was decided, that program is in ruins, largely repealed or weakened by the climate-skeptic Trump administration. Massachusetts has not provided a foundation for durable climate policy. The roots of the Clean Air Act’s climate policy failures lie not just in changes in political leadership, but also in a Supreme Court majority increasingly skeptical of not just climate regulation but of the administrative state in general. This and other barriers will persist regardless of who occupies the White House. This article explores why climate regulation under the Clean Air Act has been so much more fragile than other regulations under the statute, which actors bear responsibility for its failures, and what prospects remain for future federal climate policy.

Keywords: clean air act, climate change, climate, administrative law, environmental law

Suggested Citation

Richardson, Nathan D., The Rise and Fall of Clean Air Act Climate Policy (July 6, 2020). Michigan Journal of Environmental and Administrative Law, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3677240 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3677240

Nathan D. Richardson (Contact Author)

University of South Carolina - Law Library ( email )

1525 Senate Street
Columbia, SC 29208
United States

Resources for the Future ( email )

1616 P Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
26
Abstract Views
128
PlumX Metrics