Experimental Jurisprudence

50 Pages Posted: 15 Oct 2020 Last revised: 17 Feb 2021

See all articles by Kevin Tobia

Kevin Tobia

Georgetown University Law Center; Georgetown University - Department of Philosophy

Date Written: February 1, 2021

Abstract

“Experimental jurisprudence” is a novel empirical approach to jurisprudence. This practice has grown into a movement, as scholars increasingly conduct experimental studies of legal language and concepts including causation, consent, intent, knowledge and reasonableness. Despite its progress, the approach’s justification is still surprisingly opaque. To put it most provocatively: Jurisprudence is the study of deep and longstanding theoretical questions about law’s nature, but “experimental jurisprudence” simply surveys laypeople. Experimental jurisprudence seems to miss the mark, twice. First, laypeople—with no legal expertise—are a strange population to survey about legal theory. Second, the is-ought fallacy: Even if surveys of laypeople tell us something about what law is, they do not tell us what law should be. This Article fills this justificatory gap, articulating and defending experimental jurisprudence. Experimental jurisprudence, appropriately understood, is not only consistent with traditional jurisprudence; it is an essential branch of it.

Keywords: experimental jurisprudence, experimental philosophy, legal theory, legal philosophy, jurisprudence

Suggested Citation

Tobia, Kevin, Experimental Jurisprudence (February 1, 2021). 89 University of Chicago Law Review (2022, Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3680107 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3680107

Kevin Tobia (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/kevin-tobia/

Georgetown University - Department of Philosophy

37th and O Streets, N.W.
Washington, DC 20007
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
423
Abstract Views
1,365
rank
83,559
PlumX Metrics