Tangibility As Technology

68 Pages Posted: 11 Nov 2020 Last revised: 16 Feb 2022

See all articles by João Marinotti

João Marinotti

Indiana University Maurer School of Law; Center for Intellectual Property Research, Indiana University Maurer School of Law; Information Society Project, Yale Law School

Date Written: August 4, 2020


Property law has traditionally relied on tangible boundaries to delineate legal thinghood and to inform the bounds of in rem rights and duties. Unfortunately, property doctrines have fossilized around tangibility, causing fragmentation in the legal treatment of digital assets. In the United States, for example, cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) may simultaneously be classified as commodities, securities, currencies, assets, or not property at all, depending on the jurisdiction, domain, or specific asset in question. This fragmented system of overlapping legal treatments increases the information cost of using digital assets, decreases efficiency, and ultimately hinders future innovation.

In this piece, I propose a unified and tech neutral approach to legal thinghood, providing a theoretically coherent and robust way to increase property law’s resilience in adapting to future technologies. Specifically, I deconstruct the conceptual purpose of tangibility in traditional doctrines of legal thinghood, uncovering its role as a technology (i.e., a tool) in property law to delineate rights. From this insight, I derive a coherent doctrinal test for distinguishing between digital assets that fulfill all conceptual requisites to be legal things and assets that do not. By doing so, I conclude that the traditional ontological categories of property law, such as choses in possession, are sufficiently robust to incorporate new and evolving digital assets. This tech-neutral approach paves the way toward an elegant and efficient legal treatment of digital assets and digital resource management in the twenty first century.

Keywords: property law, private law, legal thinghood, Hohfeld, tech-neutrality, ownership, crypto, bitcoin

JEL Classification: K11, O33

Suggested Citation

Marinotti, João, Tangibility As Technology (August 4, 2020). 37(3) Georgia State University Law Review 671 (2021), Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 445, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3682090 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3682090

João Marinotti (Contact Author)

Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )

211 S. Indiana Avenue
Office #247
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States

HOME PAGE: http://law.indiana.edu/about/people/details/marinotti-joão.html

Center for Intellectual Property Research, Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )

211 South Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States

Information Society Project, Yale Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

HOME PAGE: http://law.yale.edu/joao-marinotti

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics