Forced Technology Transfer in the Case of China

30 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 2020 Last revised: 30 Oct 2020

See all articles by Jyh-An Lee

Jyh-An Lee

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Faculty of Law

Date Written: August 28, 2020

Abstract

Forced technology transfer (“FTT”) has been the most acrimonious issue in the current U.S.–China trade war. The United States has imposed several rounds of hefty tariffs on China because of the latter’s FTT practices. This Article provides a comprehensive analysis of China’s alleged FTT practices. The United States has accused China of using ownership restrictions and administrative processes to compel United States’ firms to transfer technology to Chinese entities. While China has undertaken a series of reforms prohibiting FTT practices and has signed the Phase-One trade agreement with the United States, the concerns of its trading partners and foreign businesses over FTT have not been entirely alleviated. This Article notes that China’s FTT practices are not uncommon in the developing world. However, such “market-for-technology” or quid pro quo policies have been increasingly scrutinized in the international investment, trade, and intellectual property policy settings in recent years. Moreover, despite China’s above-mentioned reforms, FTT remains an unsolved issue in the current international economic environment.

Keywords: forced technology transfer, trade secret, trade war, joint venture, foreign investment, Phase-One trade agreement

Suggested Citation

Lee, Jyh-An, Forced Technology Transfer in the Case of China (August 28, 2020). Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2020 The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2020-18, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3682351

Jyh-An Lee (Contact Author)

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Faculty of Law ( email )

6/F, Lee Shau Kee Building
Shatin, New Territories
Hong Kong

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
963
Abstract Views
4,502
Rank
52,430
PlumX Metrics