Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication. Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed. For more information on this collaboration, see the comments published in The Lancet about the trial period, and our decision to make this a permanent offering, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
The Potential Public Health and Economic Value of a Hypothetical COVID-19 Vaccine in the United States: Use of Cost-Effectiveness Modeling to Inform Vaccination Prioritization
47 Pages Posted: 25 Sep 2020More...
Background: Researchers are working at unprecedented speed to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We aimed to assess the value of a hypothetical vaccine and its potential public health impact when prioritization is required due to supply constraints.
Methods: A Markov cohort model was used to compare COVID-19 related direct medical costs and deaths in the United States (US), with versus without implementation of a 60% efficacious vaccine. To prioritize the vaccine under constrained supply, the population was divided into tiers based on age; risk and age; and occupation and age; and outcomes were compared across one year under various supply assumptions. For each prioritization strategy, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus no vaccine was calculated overall and by tier.
Findings: Overall, the cost per QALY gained for all vaccination strategies was $8,200 versus no vaccination. For the tiers at highest risk of complications from COVID-19, vaccination was cost-saving compared to no vaccination. The cost per QALY gained increased as the risk of hospitalization and death within each tier decreased. Under the most optimistic supply scenario and the most efficient prioritization scenario, the vaccine may prevent 32% of expected deaths. As supply becomes more constrained, prioritization is required to optimize the prevention of deaths.
Interpretation: A COVID-19 vaccine is predicted to be good value for money (cost per QALY gained <$50,000). The speed at which an effective vaccine can be made available will determine how much morbidity and mortality may be prevented in the US.
Funding: Moderna, Inc.
Declaration of Interests: MK and DB are shareholders in Quadrant Health Economics Inc. Quadrant Health Economics Inc. was contracted by Moderna, Inc. to conduct this study. MM and MCW are consultants at Quadrant Health Economics Inc.
Keywords: Coronavirus, COVID-19, cost-effectiveness analysis, economic analysis, SARS-CoV-2, vaccine
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation