Use of Menstruation and Fertility App Trackers: A Scoping Review of the Evidence

Earle, Sarah, Hannah R. Marston, Robin A Hadley, and Duncan Banks. 2020. 'Use of menstruation and fertility app trackers: a scoping review of the evidence.', BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health. DOI:bmjsrh-2019-200488.

20 Pages Posted: 22 Oct 2020 Last revised: 3 Mar 2023

See all articles by Sarah Earle

Sarah Earle

The Open University

Hannah Marston

Faculty of Wellbeing, Education & Language Studies, The Open University

Robin Hadley

Manchester Metropolitan University

Duncan Banks

Department of Life, Health & Chemical Sciences, The Open University

Date Written: February 18, 2020

Abstract

Introduction There has been a phenomenal worldwide increase in the development and use of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) that monitor menstruation and fertility. Critics argue that many of the apps are inaccurate and lack evidence from either clinical trials or user experience. The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the research literature on mHealth apps that track menstruation and fertility.Methods This project followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. The ACM, CINAHL, Google Scholar, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for material published between 1 January 2010 and 30 April 2019. Data summary and synthesis were used to chart and analyse the data.Results In total 654 records were reviewed. Subsequently, 135 duplicate records and 501 records that did not meet the inclusion criteria were removed. Eighteen records from 13 countries form the basis of this review. The papers reviewed cover a variety of disciplinary and methodological frameworks. Three main themes were identified: fertility and reproductive health tracking, pregnancy planning, and pregnancy prevention.Conclusions Motivations for fertility app use are varied, overlap and change over time, although women want apps that are accurate and evidence-based regardless of whether they are tracking their fertility, planning a pregnancy or using the app as a form of contraception. There is a lack of critical debate and engagement in the development, evaluation, usage and regulation of fertility and menstruation apps. The paucity of evidence-based research and absence of fertility, health professionals and users in studies is raised.

Note:
Funding Information: Funding was received via the Synergy program.

Declaration of Interests: There are no competing interests.

Keywords: menstruation and fertility apps, mobile health applications, mHealth, menstruation, fertility, menstruation and fertility trackers, scoping literature review, PRISMA, reproductive health, pregnancy planning and prevention, contraception

Suggested Citation

Earle, Sarah and Marston, Hannah and Hadley, Robin and Banks, Duncan, Use of Menstruation and Fertility App Trackers: A Scoping Review of the Evidence (February 18, 2020). Earle, Sarah, Hannah R. Marston, Robin A Hadley, and Duncan Banks. 2020. 'Use of menstruation and fertility app trackers: a scoping review of the evidence.', BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health. DOI:bmjsrh-2019-200488., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3686727

Sarah Earle

The Open University ( email )

Walton Hall
Milton Keynes, MK6 7AA
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.open.ac.uk/people/se2445

Hannah Marston (Contact Author)

Faculty of Wellbeing, Education & Language Studies, The Open University ( email )

Walton Hall
Milton Keynes, MK6 7AA
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.open.ac.uk/people/hrm93

Robin Hadley

Manchester Metropolitan University ( email )

All Saints
Manchester, M15 6BH
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://robinhadley.co.uk

Duncan Banks

Department of Life, Health & Chemical Sciences, The Open University ( email )

Walton Hall
Milton Keynes, MK6 7AA
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.open.edu/openlearn/profiles/db2298

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
31
Abstract Views
303
PlumX Metrics