How Civilian Leaders Leverage the Military’s Prestige to Shape Public Opinion

42 Pages Posted: 23 Oct 2020

See all articles by Michael Kenwick

Michael Kenwick

Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Sarah Maxey

Loyola University of Chicago - Political Science

Date Written: September 4, 2020

Abstract

How does the military’s popularity influence leaders’ domestic leeway in foreign policy? We argue that leaders have strategic incentives to publicly leverage military prestige because doing so builds support and deflects blame for decisions regarding military force. Rather than shifting power towards the military, these references primarily empower leaders. At the individual level, a survey experiment varies the identity of presidential advisors and the outcomes of a foreign policy decision. References to military advisors increase approval for both action and inaction and insulate leaders from the costs of failure. At the elite level, we analyze presidential speeches to show that leaders reference military elites more when discussing negative issues in foreign policy and less when discussing positive issues. A detailed analysis of speeches surrounding the 2007 Iraq Troop Surge further supports our expectations. Leaders have and act upon incentives to politicize the military to loosen domestic constraints on foreign policy.

Keywords: Civil-Military Relations; Foreign Policy; International Conflict

Suggested Citation

Kenwick, Michael and Maxey, Sarah, How Civilian Leaders Leverage the Military’s Prestige to Shape Public Opinion (September 4, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3686738 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3686738

Michael Kenwick (Contact Author)

Rutgers University - New Brunswick ( email )

New Brunswick, NJ
United States

Sarah Maxey

Loyola University of Chicago - Political Science ( email )

Chicago, IL
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
32
Abstract Views
221
PlumX Metrics