The Traditional Burdens for Final Injunctions in Patent Cases c.1789 and Some Modern Implications

49 Pages Posted: 28 Oct 2020

Date Written: September 7, 2020

Abstract

This Article reassesses the first two eBay factors for final injunctions—irreparable injury and the inadequacy of legal remedies—in light of traditional equitable principles. Tracking most closely with tradition would require the Federal Circuit to recognize that: (1) an injury it seeks to redress with a final injunction is future infringement itself, not just follow-on harms caused by future infringement; (2) it can presume future infringement from past infringement; (3) it can presume that legal remedies are inadequate to remedy future infringement; and (4) it need not require a plaintiff to show that alternative equitable remedies, like ongoing royalties, would inadequately redress future infringement. Moreover, the Federal Circuit can recognize, without relying on presumptions, that the burden on the first two eBay factors is not onerous. A patentee can satisfy them by showing that a defendant is likely to infringe again and that any legal damages awarded at trial did not fully compensate the patentee for the life of the patent.

Keywords: patent, patents, injunctions, ebay, chancery, copyrights, copyright, equity, remedies

Suggested Citation

Gomez-Arostegui, Tomas and Bottomley, Sean, The Traditional Burdens for Final Injunctions in Patent Cases c.1789 and Some Modern Implications (September 7, 2020). Case Western Reserve Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3687893

Tomas Gomez-Arostegui (Contact Author)

Lewis & Clark Law School ( email )

10101 S. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, OR 97219
United States
503-768-6600 (Phone)
503-768-6671 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://law.lclark.edu

Sean Bottomley

Northumbria University ( email )

Newcastle Upon Tyne
Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 8ST
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
43
Abstract Views
493
PlumX Metrics