Do Institutional Investors Mitigate Social Costs of Privatization? Evidence from Prisons

91 Pages Posted: 14 Sep 2020 Last revised: 14 Nov 2020

See all articles by Eyub Yegen

Eyub Yegen

University of Toronto, Rotman School of Management, Finance Area, University of Toronto, Finance Area

Date Written: April 15, 2020

Abstract

This paper examines whether institutional investors mitigate social costs that arise when government services are outsourced to private enterprises. Using hand-collected data on U.S. prisons, I find that privatization is associated with an increase in prisoner suicides by up to 39%. However, institutional investors of public companies managing private prisons decrease suicide rates by one third. These effects are stronger for long-term institutional investors since failing to internalize social externalities negatively impacts the long-term success of portfolio firms. Evidence from a tax reform that exogenously increases institutional ownership of prison management companies suggests that the relationship between ownership and social outcomes is causal. To explain these results, I show that institutional investors have incentives to be socially responsible due to litigation and reputation risks.

Keywords: Institutional Investors, Corporate Social Responsibility, Social Welfare

JEL Classification: A13, G23, G32, H11, L33

Suggested Citation

Yegen, Eyub, Do Institutional Investors Mitigate Social Costs of Privatization? Evidence from Prisons (April 15, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3691338 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3691338

Eyub Yegen (Contact Author)

University of Toronto, Rotman School of Management, Finance Area, University of Toronto, Finance Area ( email )

Toronto, Ontario
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
551
Abstract Views
2,173
Rank
84,376
PlumX Metrics