Are Risk-Neutral Variance and Skewness Good Proxies for their Physical Counterparts?

92 Pages Posted: 2 Dec 2020 Last revised: 15 Nov 2022

Date Written: November 15, 2022

Abstract

Many empirical papers use VIX, risk-neutral variance, or risk-neutral skewness obtained from option prices to proxy for the physical moments. I investigate whether risk-neutral moments are good proxies for physical moments in the time series and in the cross-section of stock returns. I find that risk-neutral variance is a good proxy while risk-neutral skewness is a bad proxy in both the time series and cross-section. In the time series, physical skewness is a stronger predictor of business cycle fluctuations than risk-neutral skewness. In the cross-section, a high-minus-low physical skewness portfolio carries a positive premium that is unexplained by risk-neutral skewness.

Keywords: Option implied moments, physical moments, risk-neutral moments

JEL Classification: G00, G11, G12, G13

Suggested Citation

Jensen, Christian Skov, Are Risk-Neutral Variance and Skewness Good Proxies for their Physical Counterparts? (November 15, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3694461 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3694461

Christian Skov Jensen (Contact Author)

Bocconi University ( email )

Via Roentgen 1
Milano, MI 20136
Italy

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
429
Abstract Views
2,045
Rank
132,938
PlumX Metrics