Qualified Immunity: A Legal, Practical, and Moral Failure

28 Pages Posted: 7 Nov 2020

Date Written: September 14, 2020

Abstract

Accountability is an absolute necessity for meaningful criminal justice reform, and any attempt to provide greater accountability must confront the doctrine of qualified immunity. This judicial doctrine, invented by the Supreme Court in the 1960s, protects state and local officials from liability, even when they act unlawfully, so long as their actions do not violate “clearly established law.” In practice, this legal standard is a huge hurdle for civil rights plaintiffs because it generally requires them to identify not just a clear legal rule but a prior case with functionally identical facts.

Qualified immunity is one of the most obviously unjustified legal doctrines in our nation’s history. Although it is nominally an interpretation of our primary federal civil rights statute, that statute says nothing about any immunities, qualified or otherwise. And the common-law background against which it was passed also contained nothing like the across-the-board immunity for public officials that characterizes the doctrine today. Qualified immunity has also been disastrous as a matter of policy. Victims of egregious misconduct are often left without any legal remedy simply because there does not happen to be a prior case on the books involving the exact same sort of misconduct. By undermining public accountability at a structural level, the doctrine also hurts the law enforcement community by denying police the degree of public trust and confidence they need to do their jobs safely and effectively.

The most straightforward and sensible solution to this problem is complete abolition of qualified immunity. This could be appropriately accomplished either through the Supreme Court reversing its own precedent or through congressional legislation clarifying that our civil rights laws do not include any such defense to liability. Notably, even if qualified immunity is abrogated, municipalities would still have the option to indemnify state agents under appropriate circumstances. But there are also alternatives to total abolition that would eliminate qualified immunity in the typical case while still preserving a modified kind of immunity in a few safe harbors.

Keywords: Qualified Immunity, Supreme Court, SCOTUS, Law Enforcement, Criminal Justice Reform, Legal Standard, Police Misconduct

JEL Classification: H00, H10, H11, H12, H19, K10, K14, K13, K30

Suggested Citation

Schweikert, Jay R., Qualified Immunity: A Legal, Practical, and Moral Failure (September 14, 2020). Cato Institute, Policy Analysis No. 901, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3694725

Jay R. Schweikert (Contact Author)

Cato Institute ( email )

1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-5403
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
107
Abstract Views
431
rank
343,155
PlumX Metrics