Inference from Biased Polls

57 Pages Posted: 17 Nov 2020 Last revised: 30 Jan 2021

See all articles by Andy Brownback

Andy Brownback

University of Arkansas

Nathaniel Burke

University of Arkansas

Tristan Gagnon-Bartsch

Harvard University

Date Written: December 14, 2020

Abstract

Poll respondents often attempt to present a positive image by overstating virtuous behaviors. We examine whether people account for this “socially desirable responding” (SDR) when drawing inferences from poll data. In an experiment, we incentivize “predictors” to guess others' choice behaviors across eight actions with varying social desirability. To aid guessing, predictors observe random subsamples of (i) incentivized choices or (ii) hypothetical claims from polls. Predictors show reasonable skepticism towards hypothetical claims, which exhibit predictable SDR. However, their skepticism is not tailored to the direction or magnitude of SDR. This under-correction occurs even though subjects' explicit responses can predict SDR.

Keywords: Polling, Social Desirability, Inference, Signaling, Selection Bias

JEL Classification: D91, D84, D72

Suggested Citation

Brownback, Andy and Burke, Nathaniel and Gagnon-Bartsch, Tristan, Inference from Biased Polls (December 14, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3695115 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3695115

Andy Brownback (Contact Author)

University of Arkansas ( email )

Fayetteville, AR 72701
United States

Nathaniel Burke

University of Arkansas ( email )

Fayetteville, AR 72701
United States

Tristan Gagnon-Bartsch

Harvard University ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
21
Abstract Views
198
PlumX Metrics