Is the Board of Immigration Appeals’ Refusal to Toll the Filing Period for Motions to Reopen Removal Proceedings Subject to Judicial Review?

42 Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases, Apr. 20, 2015, at 254.

3 Pages Posted: 28 Sep 2020

See all articles by D. Carolina Núñez

D. Carolina Núñez

Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School

Date Written: April 20, 2015

Abstract

Case at a Glance: Mata v. Holder

After being ordered removed from the United States, petitioner filed a motion to reopen removal
proceedings. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denied the motion based on petitioner’s untimely filing and declined to apply equitable tolling for ineffective assistance of prior counsel. Petitioner appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, arguing that the BIA should have tolled the filing period. The Fifth Circuit held that it did not have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision regarding tolling.

Keywords: U.S. Supreme Court, Immigration Law, Board Of Immigration Appeals, Removal Proceedings

Suggested Citation

Núñez, D. Carolina, Is the Board of Immigration Appeals’ Refusal to Toll the Filing Period for Motions to Reopen Removal Proceedings Subject to Judicial Review? (April 20, 2015). 42 Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases, Apr. 20, 2015, at 254., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3698165

D. Carolina Núñez (Contact Author)

Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School ( email )

430 JRCB
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
15
Abstract Views
191
PlumX Metrics