SETI and Democracy

11 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2020

Date Written: July 28, 2020

Abstract

There is a wide-ranging debate about the merits and demerits of searching for, and sending messages to, extrater- restrial intelligences (SETI and METI). There is however reasonable (but not universal) consensus that replying to a message from an extraterrestrial intelligence should not be done unilaterally, without consultation with wider society and the rest of the world. But how should this consultation actually work? In this paper we discuss various ways that decision making in such a scenario could be done democratically, and gain legitimacy. In particular we consider a scientist-led response, a politician-led response, deciding a response using a referendum, and finally using citizens’ assemblies. We present the results of a survey of a representative survey of 2,000 people in the UK on how they thought a response should best be determined, and finally discuss parallels to how the public is responding to scientific expertise in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Keywords: SETI

Suggested Citation

Hatfield, Peter and Trueblood, Leah, SETI and Democracy (July 28, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3701826 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3701826

Peter Hatfield

University of Oxford ( email )

Leah Trueblood (Contact Author)

Worcester College ( email )

Oxford
United Kingdom
07895445793 (Phone)
OX1 2HB (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/people/leah-trueblood

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
471
Rank
635,414
PlumX Metrics