Tolerance of Incoherence in Law, Graded Speech Acts and Illocutionary Pluralism

44 Pages Posted: 9 Oct 2020

See all articles by Oren Perez

Oren Perez

Bar-Ilan University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: October 9, 2020

Abstract

One of the most difficult challenges of mature legal systems is the need to balance the conflicting demands of stability and flexibility. The demand for flexibility is at odds with the principle of impartiality, which is considered a cornerstone of the rule of law. In the present article, I explore the way in which the law copes with this dilemma by developing the idea of tolerance of incoherence. I argue that tolerance of incoherence emerges from the interplay between the inferential and lexical-semantic rules that determine the meaning of legal speech acts. I base this argument on an inferential model of speech acts, which I develop through a discussion of graded speech acts, and on the idea that that the use of speech acts is governed by multiple and potentially conflicting conventions. I show how this tolerance allows the law to resolve the tension between dynamism and traditionality, and discuss its sociological and moral implications.

Keywords: incoherence, speech act pluralism, vagueness, rule of law

JEL Classification: K10

Suggested Citation

Perez, Oren, Tolerance of Incoherence in Law, Graded Speech Acts and Illocutionary Pluralism (October 9, 2020). Legal Theory (Forthcoming), Bar Ilan University Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 20-16, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3707372

Oren Perez (Contact Author)

Bar-Ilan University - Faculty of Law ( email )

Faculty of Law
Ramat Gan, 52900
Israel
+972-3-5317798 (Phone)
+972-3-5351856 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
204
PlumX Metrics